Changes in sex offender laws means fewer restrictions for some, more for others
by Lydia Senn
Jun 12, 2010 | 2073 views | 5 5 comments | 15 15 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The process of tracking and registering sex offenders in Floyd County has become both frustrating and confusing, said Cpl. Ron Morris with the Floyd County Sheriff’s Office.

“We have to go to the books and figure out what laws and what restrictions must be placed on each individual,” Morris said.

According to Morris, 81 percent of all registered sex offenders living in Floyd County have no restrictions placed on where they can be, largely because of changes in state law.

“Floyd County is going to see a huge number of sex offenders in the community with zero proximity restrictions. They can live directly across from a church or across from a day care and there are absolutely no restrictions at all,” Morris said.

The passage of several new state laws changes some of the restrictions put on convicted sex offenders, including where offenders live and work. The new guidelines are often referred to as the Sex Offender Matrix.

Law enforcement now use a proximity restrictions worksheet to help identify whether or not an offender is breaking the law.

Offenders arrested for crimes committed before June 4, 2003, have no proximity restrictions, but notify the sheriff’s office if they change jobs or move within 72 hours of any changes.

Those arrested on or after July 1, 2008, have the most residency restrictions and cannot live within 1000 feet of public and private preschool facilities, churches, schools and libraries.

Both Morris and Lt. Mark Blanton spend the majority of their work week making sure not only that the offenders abide by the law, but that the officers themselves are placing the proper restrictions on offenders.

However, while laws restrict where an offender can live, they don’t prevent an offender from moving into a community where families also live. Morris and Blanton said they often receive panic calls from community members concerned that an offender has moved in next door.

“There is nothing we can do. They have these rights,” said Morris.

“There is nothing that says they can’t attend school functions or ball game, as long as they are doing something any reasonable and prudent person would do,” Blanton added.

Often, Blanton said, concerned citizens are confusing sex offenders with sex predators. Floyd County only has three listed “predators” and two of them are behind bars, Morris said.

Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
richardcranium
|
June 14, 2010
When you realize just how many sex offenders and/or predators have illegaly relocated and failed to register where ever they landed you finally become aware of just how difficult such a law is to enforce. 'Course no one wants to talk about that; it's far too scary.

Have a nice day!
atlthrasher
|
June 14, 2010
I think the sex offender law has so many flaws. First, pedophiles and child molesters should face the death penalty. You cannot rehabilitate them and they are a drain on society along with spreading fear. Second, if a guy is 18 and the girl is 15, it there should be some wiggle room there. A 15 yr old can make reasonable judgement and if she is not coerced into the act, then leave the 18 yr old alone. Case in point, Marcus Dixon and Genarlow Wilson. Finally, if the accuser falsifies the charge, then her name should be released and let her reputation get tainted.
SirDude
|
June 14, 2010
The Bill was passed unanimously 45 to 0 by the Senate. So, actually, your comment should have read Sonny Perdue signed the bill passed unanimously by BOTH Democrats and Republicans to unleash sex offenders to rape our children.

Call your Democratic members and ask them why they, along with their Republican cohorts, passed the bill. In fact, try reading the bill first.
RealEstateMystic
|
June 14, 2010
crash1: "Sex offender" is a legal classification. Legal classifications are created by lawmakers, not people blogging away on an Internet forum. Many people (e.g., Genarlow Wilson) have had their lives destroyed for simply engaging in sexual intercourse with people their own age -- a behavior that does not fall into your wobbly category of sex offending child rapists by any stretch of the imagination. Of course, if you simply hold retrograde attitudes about sexuality in general, your response to this long overdue changing of the law is understandable, if not at all rational. Thank God you are jnot a lawmaker.
crash1
|
June 14, 2010
sonny perdue and the republican legislature has unleased sex offenders to rape our childern.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.