Saying that secrecy in government appears to be on the increase, Judge Robert W. Sweet refused to toss out a First Amendment lawsuit the newspaper filed last year to stop the Department of Justice from getting records of phone calls between two veteran journalists and sources.
The calls between journalists Judith Miller and Philip Shenon and their sources were made in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks.
In a 120-page ruling, the judge noted that the government can obtain such telephone records during a grand jury investigation when the information sought is highly material and relevant and cannot be obtained elsewhere. But he said those conditions had not been met.
Times lawyer George Freeman did not immediately return a telephone message requesting comment. Megan L. Gaffney, a spokeswoman for federal prosecutors in Manhattan, said the office had no comment.
The government had told the Times it wanted phone records from Shenon for a probe into a leak by a government employee about a planned raid on the offices of the Global Relief Foundation, an Islamic charity accused of funding terrorism.
The lawsuit had said Miller's phone records were being sought in connection with an investigation into an alleged leak about a government decision to freeze the assets of the Global Relief Foundation and another Islamic charity, the Holy Land Foundation.
In his ruling, Sweet wrote that the reporters were gathering information ``of paramount national importance'' — preparedness for the Sept. 11 attacks and the efforts to combat al-Qaida.
``The government has failed to demonstrate that the balance of the competing interests weighs in its favor,'' he added.
In a separate case, Miller is one of two reporters facing jail for refusing to divulge their sources about the 2003 leak of an undercover CIA officer's name. The other is Matthew Cooper of Time magazine
Post a Comment