Fort Oglethorpe still wrangling over pay hike for city employees
by CatWalkChatt.com
Feb 14, 2013 | 582 views | 0 0 comments | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Citizen Kay Smith reprimands the Fort Oglethorpe council, arguing that some of its members have been unfair to city manager Ron Goulart (right) in mapping out a plan for salary hikes for city employees. (Catoosa News photo/Natasha Colbaugh)
Citizen Kay Smith reprimands the Fort Oglethorpe council, arguing that some of its members have been unfair to city manager Ron Goulart (right) in mapping out a plan for salary hikes for city employees. (Catoosa News photo/Natasha Colbaugh)
slideshow
Fort Oglethorpe council this week continued talks to hammer out a pay raise plan for city employees that suits everyone. But the issue remains unresolved.

Council member Louis Hamm, during the council’s Feb. 11 meeting, proposed an even, across-the-board raise — 75-cent per hour for all city employees.

City manager Ron Goulart had been asked, during council budget talks last year, to prepare a salary increase plan and have it ready by July, mayor Lynn Long said.

“We have not seen a pay plan,” Hamm said, “and that is why I am coming here tonight with this amount.”

Hamm’s proposal hit a snag when council member Earl Gray questioned whether it exceeds the proposed 3-percent raise — and the funds set aside for that raise — in the city’s 2012-13 budget.

“That (Hamm’s proposal) would be an amount substantially over what we have in the budget,” said city manager Ron Goulart, whose plan was to give a 3-percent raise across the board.

Goulart said a 3-percent raise equals $101,978. Hamm’s proposals, he said, is estimated to be $169,000, which does not include taxes, insurance and retirement. With those items factored in, Hamm’s plan comes to about $200,000, according to Goulart.

Timing has become another factor in giving pay hikes. The council had previously agreed to wait until March to give raises because of two uncertainties: the citizens’ vote on SPLOST (special-purpose local-option sales tax) and the on-going negotiations over LOST (local-option sales tax). Depending on voter approval of SPLOST and how talks go on LOST, these two items could have a significant impact on the budget. Gray suggested that the plan for salary hikes be tabled and brought back in March, when the council would be aware of any impacts to the budget from SPLOST and LOST.

Click here to continue reading.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.