Rome, Floyd County discuss SPLOST process
by Jeremy Stewart, Staff Writer
Feb 08, 2013 | 3054 views | 9 9 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Rome and Floyd County voters could be casting ballots for or against a new SPLOST proposal as early as this November.

Officials with both governments are working to get the ball rolling on a new 1-cent special purpose, local option sales tax, and they discussed the issue at Thursday’s meeting of the Joint Services Committee.

The first step would be to create a citizen committee to help draft a list of possible projects.

That project list would be presented to the city and county governments for approval prior to going before local voters.

Voters rejected a proposed $32.4 million SPLOST on the ballot last March that would have started when the 2009 SPLOST ends on June 30.

It included a variety of road projects and capital purchases for Rome, Cave Spring and Floyd County.

While no specific projects were discussed, Rome City Manager John Bennett spoke about ways to make a SPLOST enticing to voters.

“The inclusion of energy-efficient projects is something that could be used as a selling point,” Bennett said.

Projects that would limit added operational costs also increase the likelihood of passage in the long run, he said.

A finalized ballot question would have to be submitted to the U.S. Justice Department by early September for approval to be placed on the Nov. 12 general election ballot.

While Bennett reminded officials that the SPLOST talks are still preliminary, the discussion led the Joint Services Committee to consider other issues as well.

County Commissioner Garry Fricks brought up the possibility of calling a vote on Sunday alcohol package sales in the unincorporated parts of the county, if a countywide SPLOST vote is planned.

There are city elections scheduled, but the county does not have any seats up for a vote this year, and unincorporated residents would not

otherwise be going to the polls.

A 2011 change in Georgia state law allowed local governments to put Sunday alcohol package sales on the ballot. Rome, Carters­ville, Kingston, Rockmart, Cedar­town and unincorporated Bartow County are among the places where voters have approved the sales.

Rome voters passed Sunday alcohol package sales during the March 2012 primary by a 2,458 to 1,839 margin.

Previous report 
Comments
(9)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
dumpcake
|
February 13, 2013
The best thing about the "gub'ment" in Floyd county is that they want to tax us for projects that they have no idea how to obtain funds for in regards to future maintenance and upkeep costs.

Case(s) in point - The new radio system; anything related to Parks and Recreation; anything related to local road construction and upkeep.

I just hope they don't dream up something "education" related to pitch to the masses. Kids are the trojan horse of taxes. "PASS IT FOR THE KIDS OR YOU'RE A BAD PERSON!"
coosatown
|
February 11, 2013
This SPLOST is already dead in the water. Maybe the city and county commissioners should pass the hat among themselves to hire a public relations firm. Politics 101 (from a non-politician): 1. Prepare a concise list of proposed projects before anything goes in print to the public.2. Said list must be projects to support the infrastructure of the city and county. No "pet" projects 3. Do not try to "entice" voters to support SPLOST with rhetoric. We, the taxpayers, are not as dumb as we look.
chrishardin
|
February 08, 2013
Rumor is city/county government want a 6 year SPLOST
tullock
|
February 08, 2013
No way in ... that I'd vote for that. If commissioners propose that they are shockingly out of touch.
tullock
|
February 08, 2013
I am strongly anti-tax but I just might go for a 6-month SPLOST to pay for new fire trucks, school buses or other capital equipment. Anything more then no way.
sunflower63
|
February 08, 2013
The taxpayers of Floyd County have an idea. Why not completely finish all the projects that we have already voted for over the past 20 years before we consider funding anymore "wish lists".

Draft that !
chrishardin
|
February 08, 2013
Katie Dempsey Tennis Center and The Chambers GE Rec facility. We can't keep Recs open full time right now, but they want tax payers to pay for construction of more facilities?

RoyE
|
February 08, 2013
It's probably not going to be very easy to sale the voters on a SPLOST when they've yet to determine what the $$$ will be spent on. And since they don't have an obvious project in mind just, maybe that could mean the SPLOST is not needed? Maybe let the citizens keep that 1 cent? Every little bit helps! Sounds to me like they are saying "We just want some money, but we don't know what for yet."

If they are insisting on a SPLOST, the most worthy issue I can think of is to save the jobs that will be lost when this $7 million RIF from Floyd County BOE goes in to effect.

Voters are more likely to approve the SPLOSTS to save jobs because everyone in this county knows BOE employees who need their paychecks. Voters aren't likely to approve a SPLOST just because politicians just want money. Now is not the time for "capital purchases." Maybe a good "selling point" could be the education of this county's children. I'm sure we will eventually hear "we can't use SPLOST funds for the BOE."
TinyOne
|
February 08, 2013
Read our lips......NO NEW TAXES....for anything...Don't y'all read the paper.....Didn't you see that the FCBOE is preparing to single handedly raise the unemployment rate......come on folks.....grow a set and say NO!
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.