Citi Center's permit suspended by US Corps of Engineers
by Diane Wagner, Staff Writer
May 13, 2012 | 3449 views | 6 6 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
download Citi Center Corps Permit Letter
Burwell Creek flows through the area R.H. Ledbetter Properties plans to build its Citi Citi retail development. (Daniel Varnado, RN-T.com)
Burwell Creek flows through the area R.H. Ledbetter Properties plans to build its Citi Citi retail development. (Daniel Varnado, RN-T.com)
slideshow
The Citi Center retail development is planned on Riverside Parkway. (Daniel Varnado / Rome News-Tribune)
The Citi Center retail development is planned on Riverside Parkway. (Daniel Varnado / Rome News-Tribune)
slideshow
Local environmentalists are calling it a qualified win, but developers behind the Citi Center shopping center project on Riverside Parkway say a suspension of their permit won’t change their plans.

“We’re still moving forward,” said Wright Led­better, executive vice president of operations for R.H. Ledbetter Properties Inc. “We remain very committed to this project and excited about its potential for Rome and Floyd County.”

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers suspended this month the construction permit it issued for the nearly 300,000-square-foot shopping center on city-owned property across from Ridge Ferry Park.

Burwell Creek runs through the site, which also contains a closed city landfill, wetlands and a flood plain. When Coosa River Basin Initiative opponents pointed out that the planned earth-moving wasn’t for the purpose of cleaning up the landfill, as the permit application had stated, the Corps called a halt.

“All activities or work subject to Department of Army jurisdiction that were previously authorized by the suspended permit must immediately cease,” reads the letter to Ledbetter from David E. Crosby, acting chief of the USACE regulatory division.

“Following this suspension, a decision will be made to reinstate, modify or revoke the permit,” it continues.

Joe Cook, executive director of CRBI, said he believes water protection regulations will ultimately kill the shopping center. The tract, he said, is an important piece of greenspace that should be preserved. “The wetlands and the flood plain there help protect other property from flooding,” he said. “They also provide habitat for a wide variety of wildlife and help filter pollutants from Burwell Creek and the Oostanaula River.

“They also provide a place for people to experience a little bit of nature in downtown Rome.”

Ledbetter said original plans for the property have been changed to preserve more of the land, and they no longer intend to reroute

the creek. That’s why he says the permit suspension is not a major issue.

“We’ve made substantial improvements to the project plan, and these improvements will require separate permits anyway,” he said.

Rome City Commissioner Kim Canada chairs the redevelopment committee that’s been overseeing the project since the city granted Ledbetter an option in 2007. Canada said Rome has no other immediate plans for the vacant land, so the delay alone doesn’t change things.

“The committee is committed to it, as long as permits

are in place,” he said. “We’re still supportive of it for the economic impact, the jobs and sales tax revenue it will have.”

Canada said the Ledbetters “have been very diligent” about ensuring the Citi Center project will be environmentally and financially sound — and he’s willing to wait until its foundation is solid.

“I don’t want it to be a project that gets started and then stops,” he said. “I want them to be 100 percent committed to it before it starts.”

Crosby’s letter did not indicate when the permit issue may be resolved, but Cook said he is hoping a hearing will be scheduled to allow for more public involvement in the process.
Comments
(6)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
TheSeer
|
May 14, 2012
Location, location, location! This is an ideal place for a shopping center of this nature and the wetlands argument being raised is just as bogus as the opposition the Rollins family is putting up to the 411 corridor. There is a reason why Mount Berry Square doesn't draw flies and why no one has built shopping centers next to State Mutual Stafium or on Technology Parkway. Those are not places most Romans--or at least those with money to spend--will go to shop. I have been a regular donor to CRBI but they are so off base on this issue that I will think long and hard before I make another contribution to them.
acct101
|
May 14, 2012
Seer, you said the magic word, Location. When I do go to Riverbend, I visit Belk’s, Sears and Penny’s. Since Bon Worth left I do not even enter the other stores in the Mall.

I side with the Ledbetters on this issue.
appalucy
|
May 16, 2012
I don't think it is anything like the Rollins family issue. Like having this strip mall up by the stadium would be so far away? I am not a tree-hugger but the flood plain is really important to that area. Where do they anticipate the water to go when they pave it over? That is a lot of water and it has to go somewhere. If Best Buy or Dicks or other large store wants to come to this area, there is more than enough vacant land around to fit everyone's needs without paving over. I much needed store (such as a decent electronics store) would do find in the old circuit city building. Unfortunately, I think the $$ signs will win this conflict.
appalucy
|
May 16, 2012
excuse the typos, plz.
EyesonRome
|
May 14, 2012
I cannot understand for the life of me why Rome insists on allowing the continued destruction of our wetlands and very important floodplains. Sure, Rome is protected by levees; but floodplains play a vital role in keeping our city safe from major flooding. At some point we will all wish we had floodplains in place where concrete and more vacant buildings sit.

And, if the developers are so committed to building “Citi Center” to help boost the economy why not look for alternative spots? From what I can see there is ample land beside State Mutual Stadium. OR better yet, why not build a shopping center on one of the many vacant spaces on Technology Parkway? There are so many options to build a shopping center without destruction of our beautiful and vital wetlands.

As I pointed out in a previous comment: Rome has vacant properties all over that can be repurposed. Just look at the vacant space behind Kroger on Riverbend Dr. What about the vacant retail space behind Home Depot and K-Mart? What about the old Kroger in West Rome? What about the location next door to Staples; and the other vacant spots in that shopping center? How about the vacant spaces next door to the Chinese place in the IHOP parking lot? On top of all these, we have Mount Berry “mall” that is a terrible joke of a mall with at least 30 percent vacancy; which as of 11 days ago; is back up for sale.

ElTiante
|
May 13, 2012
Doesn't the city have enough partially or completely vacant shopping centers?

Wouldn't we be better served trying to direct that development into the downtown area? Despite complaints from some about parking, I've never had trouble finding a spot either on Broad or on a side street.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.