Obama pulls plug on part of health overhaul law, Gingrey reacts
by Staff, AP reports
Oct 14, 2011 | 1129 views | 1 1 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Phil Gingrey
Phil Gingrey
slideshow
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration says it is unable to go forward with a major program in the president's signature health care overhaul law — a new long-term care insurance plan.

Officials said Friday the long-term care program has critical design flaws that can't be fixed to make it financially self-sustaining.

Congressman Phil Gingrey, (GA-11) today released the following statement in response to the collapse of the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS) Act Program.



“Today, Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced that the Department of Health and Human Services would not move forward with implementation of the CLASS Act program—a clear victory for the American taxpayer," Gingrey said. “During this economic crisis, Congress must focus on eliminating the waste and fraud already present in our Medicare system before implementing unnecessary programs that cannot function without massive taxpayer bailouts. I am pleased that the Department of Health and Human Services has finally recognized the insolvency of the CLASS Program.”

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told Congress in a letter that she does not see a viable path forward at this time. By law, implementation of the program was contingent on Sebelius certifying it financially sound.

The program was supposed to be a voluntary insurance plan for working adults regardless of age or health. Workers would pay an affordable monthly premium during their careers, and could collect a modest daily cash benefit if they became disabled later in life.

The problem all along has been how to ensure enough healthy people would sign up.

A longstanding priority of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports program, or CLASS, was spliced into the health care law despite nagging budget worries.

CLASS was intended as a voluntary plan, supported by premiums, not taxpayer dollars. Workers would pay around $100 a month or less. In exchange, they would receive a modest daily cash benefit averaging no less than $50 if they became disabled later in life. Beneficiaries could use the money for services to help them stay at home, or to help with nursing home bills.

Kennedy's idea was to give families some financial breathing room. The burden of long-term care is growing. Most families cannot afford to hire a home health aide for a frail elder, let alone pay nursing home bills. Long-term care is usually provided by family members, often a spouse who may also have health problems.

But a central design flaw dogged CLASS from the beginning. Unless large numbers of healthy people willingly sign up during their working years, soaring premiums driven by the needs of disabled beneficiaries would destabilize it, eventually requiring a taxpayer bailout.

It's unclear whether the program can be salvaged. Congressional Republicans are committed to repealing it.
Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
FormerRoman
|
October 14, 2011
Well, Most of Obama's proposals aren't financially sound..Can we repeal all his other idiotic ideas..Hate to say that the pundits were absolutely correct in opposing this piece of garbage.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.