GOP issues new 'fiscal cliff' offer to Obama
by ANDREW TAYLOR,Associated Press
Dec 03, 2012 | 4330 views | 12 12 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-Ohio, speaks to reporters after the House Republicans voted for their leadership for the next session of Congress, at the Capitol in Washington, Wednesday, Nov. 14, 2012. He is flanked by Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., left, and Rep. Lynn Jenkins, R-Kan., right. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-Ohio, speaks to reporters after the House Republicans voted for their leadership for the next session of Congress, at the Capitol in Washington, Wednesday, Nov. 14, 2012. He is flanked by Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., left, and Rep. Lynn Jenkins, R-Kan., right. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
slideshow
WASHINGTON (AP) — House Republicans on Monday proposed a new 10-year, $2.2 trillion blueprint to President Barack Obama that calls for increasing the eligibility age for Medicare and lowering cost-of-living hikes for Social Security benefits.

The proposal from House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and other Republicans comes in response to Obama's offer last week to hike taxes by $1.6 trillion over the coming decade but largely exempt Medicare and Social Security from budget cuts.

The GOP plan also proposes to raise $800 billion in higher tax revenue over the decade but it would keep the Bush-era tax cuts — including those for wealthier earners targeted by Obama — in place for now.

Boehner said the GOP proposal is a "credible plan" for Obama and that he hopes the administration would "respond in a timely and responsible way." The offer comes after the administration urged Republicans to detail their proposal to cut popular benefits programs like Medicare, Social Security and Medicaid.

"After the election I offered to speed this up by putting revenue on the table and unfortunately the White House responded with their la-la land offer that couldn't pass the House, couldn't pass the Senate and it was basically the president's budget from last February," Boehner told reporters.

The Boehner proposal revives a host of ideas from failed talks with Obama in the summer of 2011. Then, Obama was willing to discuss politically controversial ideas like raising the eligibility age for Medicare, implementing a new inflation adjustment for Social Security cost-of-living adjustments and requiring wealthier Medicare recipients to pay more for their benefits.

On Monday, Obama did not respond to questions from reporters on his reaction to the Republican counteroffer or whether he had seen the proposal. He was asked about the offer during an event in the Oval Office with the Bulgarian prime minister.

The clock is ticking closer to the end-of-year deadline to avert the fiscal cliff, which is a combination of the expiration of Bush-era tax cuts and automatic, across-the-board spending cuts that are the result of prior failures of Congress and Obama to make a budget deal.

Many economists say such a one-two punch could send the fragile economy back into recession.

GOP aides said the plan was based on a plan floated by Erskine Bowles in testimony to the special deficit "supercommittee" last year — in effect a milder version of the highly controversial 2010 Bowles proposal that caused both GOP and Democratic leaders in Congress to recoil.

By GOP math, the plan would produce $2.2 trillion in saving over the coming decade: $800 billion in higher taxes; $600 billion in savings from costly health care programs like Medicare; $300 billion from other proposals like forcing federal workers to contribute more toward their pensions; and $300 billion in additional savings from the Pentagon budget and domestic programs funded by Congress each year.

Under the administration's math, GOP aides said, the plan represents $4.6 trillion in 10-year savings. That estimate accounts for earlier cuts enacted during last year's showdown over lifting the government's borrowing cap and also factors in war savings and lower interest payments on the $16.4 trillion national debt.

Last week, the White House delivered to Capitol Hill its opening proposal: $1.6 trillion in higher taxes over a decade, a possible extension of the temporary Social Security payroll tax cut and heightened presidential power to raise the national debt limit.

In exchange, the president would back $600 billion in spending cuts, including $350 billion from Medicare and other health programs. But he also wants $200 billion in new spending for jobless benefits, public works projects and aid for struggling homeowners. His proposal for raising the ceiling on government borrowing would make it virtually impossible for Congress to block him going forward.

Republicans said they responded in closed-door meetings with laughter and disbelief.

The GOP plan is certain to whip up opposition from Democrats opposed to any action now on Social Security, whose defenders say should not be part of any fiscal cliff deal. And Democrats also are deeply skeptical of raising the Medicare age.

Both ideas were part of negotiations between Boehner and Obama in the summer of last year.

In a letter to the president, Boehner and six other House Republicans insisted that the November election that returned Obama to the White House and the GOP to majority control in the House requires both parties to come together "on a fair middle ground."

"With the fiscal cliff nearing, our priority remains finding a reasonable solution that can pass both the House and Senate, and be signed into law in the next couple of weeks," Republicans wrote.

One of the few things the White House and Capitol Hill Republicans can agree to is a framework that would make a "down payment" on the deficit and all or most of the extend expiring Bush-era tax cuts but leave most of the legislative grunt work until next year.

Republicans dismissed the notion of raising tax rates and said flatly they would oppose them. Instead, new revenue would come from tax reform, closing loopholes and deductions while lowering rates, according to the Bowles plan.

Signing the letter was Boehner, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy and Rep. Paul Ryan, the chairman of the House Budget Committee and the unsuccessful GOP vice presidential candidate. Rep. Dave Camp, chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, Fred Upton, chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, and Cathy McMorris Rodgers, the Republican Conference chair, also signed the letter.

In a scathing attack, Republican leader Mitch McConnell said, "if the president is serious about joining us in an effort to reduce the deficit and protect the economy, he'll get off the campaign trail, drop the left-wing talking points, and instruct his staff to negotiate a solution in good faith based on actual written proposals. In short, he'll begin doing what leaders do: Lead."
Comments
(12)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Termlimits
|
December 07, 2012
Whine! Whine! Whine! Heyyyy, Maracana

The GOP "counter-offer" to the president's fiscal-cliff proposal isn't really an offer at all: It's a rehash of the tired and extremist right-wing economic warfare which the American people soundly rejected last month.
Watchingit
|
December 07, 2012
Not rage-crying, term-limits. Just pointing out the obvious. If you were less selective in your reading habits, you would find there is a great deal going on out there that does not fit the liberal view of Utopia under Obama’s leadership (or lack of).
Termlimits
|
December 07, 2012
Watchingit - Still unable to stop rage-crying over the election
Watchingit
|
December 07, 2012
They may have won Washington, but after the Nov 6 election, 24 states will be controlled by Republications and 13 by Democrats. These numbers include control of the legislatures as well as governorships. The remaining will be mixed control of governors/legislature (with the GOP in control of the House and the Dems in control of the Senate, this applies to DC also).

Obama has no one to blame but himself for whatever happens the next four years. Of course, that will not stop him from trying to throw the blame elsewhere. “Not my fault!” will be his refrain in one form or another.
ua72
|
December 07, 2012
Obama WON the election REPUBLICANS GET OVER IT!!!!
JoMadden
|
December 05, 2012
There is no shame anymore. We vote for the person who promises to take the most from someone else and give it to us. We celebrate the number of illegitimate children we have and can't afford, because we know that if we become a broodmare we will be rewarded by the government giving us more of other people's wealth.

This is the current state of our society and if you want votes, you had better jump on board. If you want wealth, you better start swimming.

To that end, my wife's employer has just announced that when Obamacare is implemented, all employee hours will be cut. They were told it's not a threat to coerce them vote Republican because it would be an untimely threat, it was simply a forewarning of what's to come so that they can make arrangements.
Termlimits
|
December 05, 2012
Republicans, bad at polling math, bad at budget math.

Deficit could end in 5 minutes. Just pass a law that says that anytime there is a deficit of more than 3% of GDP all sitting members of congress are ineligible for reelection.
wheninrome
|
December 05, 2012
It's quite simple. We will fall from the cliff. When the president runs on the platform of raising taxes on the rich, and wins decidedly, do not expect him to back down. ALL tax cuts will end, and the Republicans can keep their constituents complacent by not having "allowed" it. They all know it is going to happen, but can't be seen as the one who gave in to Obama by agreeing to it.

Part 2 will be the real test. People have already received letters stating that unemployment will end on December 29th. I like this part. Inject a little desperation into those who are riding out their unemployment without making an effort at becoming employed again. Watch the unemployment dip dramatically in the coming months.

There is a reason that the cliff looms. My elementary version is that Republicans assumed that they would take the White House in November. As such, Obamacare would be repealed and the Bush tax cuts extended. How's that workin' out for ya?
TheSeer
|
December 04, 2012
Both sides are to blame. The Republicans must be willing to vote for some increases in tax rates. Democrats must be willing to cuts in spending and entitlement programs. Thy can compromise on the little stuff but, until they are willing to compromise on the big stuff, they are equally at fault.
dbeall
|
December 04, 2012
Given the level of spending that has occurred not just in the last four years, but really in my lifetime, I do not agree that we have to tolerate tax increases. What we should seek to do is eliminate government programs to the point where each branch of the government is living within the enumerated powers granted by the Constitution and nothing more.

Icarus10
|
December 04, 2012
You can't lead people who don't want to cooperate and are a bunch egotistical idiots, Republicans can't get over the fact they lost and are willing to let us all go down the drain because of a few of their rich friends, heck Reagan was even smarter than this, Boehner is a joke.
FormerRomanJr.
|
December 05, 2012
Obama had TWO years of complete control in the House, Senate and the White House..He did ABSOLUTELY nothing on the debt..

Just continued to spend recklessly and he extended the Bush tax cuts..Kicked the can down the road until he has the chance to blame Republicans..He's Inept as a leader.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.