Gunman dead, 2 wounded at Texas transit station
24 mins 30 secs ago | 54 views | 0 0 comments | 0 0 recommendations | email to a friend | print
RICHARDSON, Texas (AP) — A man suspected of wounding a police officer and two bystanders when he opened fire from the platform of a suburban Dallas transit station was found shot to death Tuesday after exchanging gunfire with other officers who pursued him, authorities said.

The man died of a gunshot wound to the head, but it wasn't immediately clear whether the officers killed him or he shot himself, Richardson police Sgt. Kevin Perlich said.

The incident happened about 3:30 p.m. Tuesday at a Dallas Area Rapid Transit "Red Line" train station in Richardson, DART spokesman Mark Ball said.

The driver of a DART bus told a transit police officer at the station that a man who had just boarded was being disorderly, Perlich said. The man, who was walking toward a waiting DART train, opened fire when the officer confronted him.

After the transit officer returned fire, the man fled to a nearby warehouse, where he exchanged fire with other officers who pursued him. That's where he was found dead, Perlich said.

One bystander suffered life-threatening wounds and required cardiopulmonary resuscitation at the scene, fire chief Alan Palomba said. Injuries to the officer and the other bystander weren't considered life-threatening.

It was the latest in a string of violent incidents reported recently at DART stations.

Last month, a man was shot to death during an argument with three people at a station in downtown Dallas.

In December, undercover Dallas police officers shot and killed a suspect who they say brandished a handgun aboard an Amtrak train stopped at Union Station in Dallas, the hub of DART's rail network. An officer and a bystander were wounded.

A few weeks earlier, four juveniles were arrested and charged with murder after a 19-year-old man was shoved against an accelerating DART train at a platform near Fair Park, southeast of downtown Dallas.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Experts to bishops: pedophiles lie, trust victims
by NICOLE WINFIELD, Associated Press
50 mins 47 secs ago | 165 views | 0 0 comments | 1 1 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Marie Collins, right, who was assaulted as a 13-year-old by a hospital chaplain in her native Ireland, is flanked by British psychiatry professor Sheila Hollins, as she attends a press conference at a Vatican-backed symposium on clerical sex abuse, in Rome, Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2012. Psychologists told bishops from around the world Tuesday that priests who rape and molest children usually lie when confronted with an accusation, and that they should listen to victims since they usually tell the truth and need to be believed in order to heal. The messages were delivered at a Vatican-backed symposium on clerical sex abuse that is aimed at compelling bishops to create tough policies to protect children and root out pedophiles from the priesthood. (AP Photo/Andrew Medichini)
Marie Collins, right, who was assaulted as a 13-year-old by a hospital chaplain in her native Ireland, is flanked by British psychiatry professor Sheila Hollins, as she attends a press conference at a Vatican-backed symposium on clerical sex abuse, in Rome, Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2012. Psychologists told bishops from around the world Tuesday that priests who rape and molest children usually lie when confronted with an accusation, and that they should listen to victims since they usually tell the truth and need to be believed in order to heal. The messages were delivered at a Vatican-backed symposium on clerical sex abuse that is aimed at compelling bishops to create tough policies to protect children and root out pedophiles from the priesthood. (AP Photo/Andrew Medichini)
slideshow
ROME (AP) — Priests who rape and molest children lie when confronted with an accusation but victims usually tell the truth, psychologists told Catholic bishops at a symposium Tuesday, advising them to listen first to the victims.

The message came during a Vatican-backed meeting on clerical sex abuse that aimed to help bishops draft and enforce tough policies to protect children and root out pedophiles from the priesthood. Priests and bishops from about 100 countries were attending the four-day symposium at Rome's Pontifical Gregorian University ahead of a May deadline to deliver their sex abuse policies to the Vatican.

Survivors of clerical abuse have long said that once they summoned the courage to denounce their abusers to church leaders, Catholic bishops often dismissed their accusations and instead accepted the word of their priests, whom bishops consider their brothers and sons in the priesthood.

That pattern led to decades in which bishops shuffled pedophiles from parish to parish, protecting the church's reputation at all costs, while victims were left to feel like they were to blame for the abuse.

Marie Collins, who was assaulted as a 13-year-old by a hospital chaplain in her native Ireland, told the bishops that dynamic led to multiple hospitalizations later in life for anxiety and depression. She told her story of abuse and how the church's response to it — refusing to believe her, telling her it was her fault and taking the priest's word over hers — made the initial trauma even worse.

"I was treated as someone with an agenda against the church, the police investigation was obstructed and the laity misled. I was distraught," said Collins, who has since become a prominent Irish campaigner in the fight for accountability in the church.

Collins in 1996 went to Dublin's then-archbishop, Cardinal Desmond Connell with her story, knowing that the Irish bishops had just adopted tough new policy to report abusers to police. She said Connell told her that he didn't have to follow the church's guidelines.

Eventually, civil authorities prosecuted and jailed the priest, the Rev. Paul McGennis, and he was sentenced two more times for molesting other children.

Monsignor Stephen Rossetti, a psychologist who for a decade ran a U.S. treatment center for abusive priests, told the conference Tuesday that just like alcoholics or drug addicts, sexually abusive priests often lie when confronted with allegations. They manipulate, they con, they deny, he said.

"There are false allegations to be sure" and it's critical to restore a priest's good name when he has been cleared, Rossetti said in his prepared remarks. "But decades of experience tell us that the vast majority of allegations — over 95 percent — are founded."

As a result, he said, trained civil authorities, not bishops, should determine whether an allegation is well-founded. Even if prosecutors don't proceed with a criminal case, either because too much time has passed or evidence is lacking, bishops should form an advisory panel of law enforcement, mental health and canon law experts to investigate and decide how to proceed, Rossetti said.

The Vatican, however, has been extremely lukewarm to the idea of lay review boards helping bishops decide whether any canon laws were broken or whether a priest should be reported to police.

By ordering bishops conferences around the world to come up with abuse policies by May, the Vatican has diminished the role that lay review boards might have, saying while they may be "foreseen" in some places they cannot substitute for the discernment of bishops.

There have been several high-profile cases in the United States and Ireland — which together have some of the toughest policies — where bishops declined to inform their review boards about abuse accusations and prosecutors later indicted the clergymen.

Collins said the church should sanction those bishops who fail to deal appropriately with pedophiles or fail to follow their own abuse guidelines. She has also suggested that Pope Benedict XVI and others in the church hierarchy ask for forgiveness for their own failures in covering up the abuse.

Late Tuesday, Cardinal Marc Ouellet, who heads the Vatican's office for bishops, presided over a vigil service of repentance in which he and several bishops begged forgiveness for what Ouellet called the "evil" in the church.

"We who were supposed to save the 'least of these,' we have at times become an instrument of evil against them," he said.

Dr. Sheila Hollins, a psychiatrist who participated in a Vatican-ordered investigation of the church in Ireland, said victims need to be heard by the church to start healing from their abuse.

"Not being believed or even worse, being blamed for the abuse, adds hugely to the emotional and mental suffering caused by sexual abuse," she told the bishops. The failure of the priests to admit his guilt, or for his superiors to take appropriate action "further compounds the damage."

Advocates for victims have dismissed the symposium as a farce, saying the only way children will be safe is if the Vatican releases the names and files of known molesters. But organizers say the conference shows an unprecedented commitment by the Vatican to crack down on abuse after years of turning a blind eye.

That said, Rossetti said he had no illusions that the symposium would quickly change a culture that has long protected the institution over victims.

"Children are going to be abused while we're learning, which is a pretty sad state of affairs," he told reporters. "The faster we can change the culture, the better. But it's like pushing a mountain."

Terence McKiernan, president of the sex abuse database BishopAccountability.org, welcomed Collins's presence at the conference but said the meeting was merely public relations exercise.

"The Vatican is afraid, and it has reason to be. Police with search warrants are confiscating diocesan records in Belgium; a complaint has been filed against the Vatican with the International Criminal Court; the Vatican for the first time has been forced to produce documents in a U.S. civil case; and three dioceses and the orders responsible for abuse in Catholic residential schools have been investigated by the Irish government," he said in a statement.

The sex abuse scandal, which erupted in the 1990s in Ireland and in 2002 in the United States, exploded across Europe in 2010, with thousands of new victims coming forward.

In the conference's keynote address Monday, Cardinal William Levada, who heads the Vatican office that deals with abuse cases, said his office has received more than 4,000 cases in the past decade.

In March 2010, that figure stood at 3,000, the bulk of them from the United States. Vatican officials privately have acknowledged some 400 cases annually are now being reported to Rome, though mostly from places other than the United States.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
InformedBusinessRoman
|
February 07, 2012
I agree, but it ain't over yet. Let's see if the city can work with the private sector and come up with a compromise.
Update: Santorum wins Minnesota caucuses, nonbinding Missouri
by The Associated Press
1 hr 14 mins ago | 278 views | 0 0 comments | 0 0 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Republican presidential candidate, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum speaks to local residents during a campaign stop at the Java Lounge coffee shop, Wednesday, Nov. 2, 2011, in Williamsburg, Iowa. (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall)
Republican presidential candidate, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum speaks to local residents during a campaign stop at the Java Lounge coffee shop, Wednesday, Nov. 2, 2011, in Williamsburg, Iowa. (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall)
slideshow
WASHINGTON (AP) — A resurgent Rick Santorum won Minnesota's Republican caucuses with ease Tuesday night, relegating front-runner Mitt Romney to a distant third-place finish that raised fresh questions about his ability to attract ardent conservatives at the core of the GOP political base.

Santorum was victorious, as well, in a nonbinding Missouri primary that was worth bragging rights but no delegates.

A jubilant Santorum declared to cheering supporters in St. Joseph, Mo.: "Conservatism is alive and well in Missouri and Minnesota!"

Colorado held caucuses, too. The first few hundred votes tallied trended Santorum's way, but the count lagged well behind Minnesota's.

Returns from 42 percent of Minnesota's precincts showed Santorum with 46 percent support, Paul with 27 percent and Romney — who won the state in his first try for the nomination four years ago — with 16 percent. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich trailed with 11 percent.

Romney prevailed in both Minnesota and Colorado in 2008, the first time he ran for the nomination, but the GOP has become more conservative in both states since then under the influence of tea party activists.

There were 37 Republican National Convention delegates at stake in Minnesota and 33 more in Colorado, and together, they accounted for the largest one-day combined total so far in the race for the GOP nomination.

Minnesota's victory was the first for Santorum since he eked out a 34-vote win in the lead-off Iowa caucuses a month ago.

He had faded far from the lead in the primaries and caucuses since, and Gingrich seemed to eclipse him as the leading conservative rival to Romney when he won the South Carolina primary late last month.

Posted earlier

ST. CHARLES, Mo. (AP) — Republican Rick Santorum won Missouri's non-binding presidential primary Tuesday and waited optimistically for a pair of state caucuses that could end front-runner Mitt Romney's modest winning streak and launch his comeback for the party's nomination.

The former Pennsylvania senator's victory in Missouri was worth bragging rights but no delegates. They will be chosen beginning next month in caucuses expected to draw far more competition from Romney, Newt Gingrich and Texas Rep. Ron Paul. Gingrich wasn't on the ballot and Romney and Paul barely campaigned here.

Meanwhile, the 70 delegates at stake in Colorado and Minnesota combined were the biggest one-day total so far in the GOP race to name an opponent for President Barack Obama.

Earlier in the day, Santorum urged supporters to reset the Republican presidential race and deny the aura of inevitability to Romney. Santorum also said they must reject Obama's secular policies.

"You've got a big caucus tonight," Santorum said at the start of a three-state swing that included stops in Minnesota and Missouri, where he awaited election results. "If you look at the polls, today could be a very good day for conservatives."

Santorum began a busy campaign day in the Christian conservative stronghold of Colorado Springs, home base for the Christian group Focus on the Family, whose leader has endorsed him.

Citing the Obama administration's recent requirement that church-affiliated employers cover birth control for their workers, he told a gathering that Obama was trampling on their faith and forcing them to live according to his secular worldview.

"Ladies and gentlemen, it's not just your economic rights," said Santorum, a Catholic, vowing to make the issue a centerpiece of his White House bid. "It's your freedom of religion. It's your freedom of speech."

Santorum largely bypassed last week's contests in Florida and Nevada to lay the groundwork for Tuesday's trio of states. He's been aggressively criticizing Romney and Gingrich and holding himself out as the candidate best able to defeat Obama.

Santorum was the victor in Iowa, but since then had chalked up four consecutive losses.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
InformedBusinessRoman
|
February 07, 2012
Kim missed the entire point of the issue in this article. Until last year, the new amended code was not being enforced for sprinklers on restaurants w alcohol on broad which had 100 to 300 seats if the building was under 5000 feet. Thomasville, Savannah, Augusta, and Columbus, among other progressive communities in Georgia only abide by the State requirements, which are that restaurants must sprinkle only if they have more than 300 seats and serve alcohol or are larger than 5000 sq feet. So basically, this will impact ALL restaurants who have alcohol and 100 seating capacity. And most that the public would like to see come to downtown Rome in the future, like Applacian Grill, for example, would have 120 to 140 seats, or more. 30 to 50k is not something most small businesses can afford, on top of completely renovating a historic building. So the point is that the way this ordinance is written is that it is going to be counter productive to developing downtown in the coming years. If someone lives above in a loft, obviously there is a need for a sprinkler as the loft will now push most buildings over the 5000 sq foot limit, plus it just makes sense in terms of safety. But for a one level, 2500 sq foot restaurant, it seems to be a little over the top, considering the crazy expense. Maybe the city should pay for this if it is such a necessity.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.