Attorney for Democrats tells Ga. Supreme Court the photo-ID law is unconstitutional
by Walter C. Jones, Morris News Service
17 months ago | 957 views | 6 6 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Requiring a picture ID card to vote violates the state constitution, an attorney for the Democratic Party of Georgia told the Supreme Court Tuesday afternoon.

But an attorney hired by the state argued the law is constitutional and common sense.

The two sides took 20 minutes each to make their case before Georgia’s highest court. A similar case in federal court ended with the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals upholding the law last year.

The party also sued in state court. In April of this year, a Fulton County judge also ruled the law was permissible, setting up the appeal pending before the seven justices of the Supreme Court.

“The (state) Constitution says you cannot be denied the right to vote if you are registered,” Democratic lawyer Emmet Bondurant told the justices.

The Constitution doesn’t give the legislature authority to provide other reasons for preventing someone from casing a ballot, he argued.

But Mark Cohen, on behalf of the state, said no one has been denied the right to vote because of the 2006 voter-ID law.

“Not one Georgia has been located in all that time who could not vote due to this law,” he said.
Comments
(6)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
gahalls
|
September 10, 2010
Voter if you where black???? Never mind that joke is too easy.
ipaytaxes
|
September 09, 2010
mustbeademocrat - would you kindly provide links concerning MOVE? from what i am reading the STATES not the federal gov't are requesting waivers to the MOVE act.
Mipoco
|
September 08, 2010
So in summing up here this is what I hear from posters:

Right wingers are afraid that left wingers are voting in the names of dead people thereby offsetting the right wings Diebold back door tricks. Seems only fair that we also get paper proof of how we vote so maybe we can stop that right wing Diebold mess. Yes I know they changed the name but the machines are still the same.
proud2be
|
September 07, 2010
"If you have time to stand in line and vote, then you have time to get an ID, so everyone knows you are you, and not a live person voting for a dead person, or whatever."

that is the comment of the day!

hoyt28
|
September 07, 2010
The Bush justice department? What's that. You must live under the rock of Bush. Unless you are illegel there should be NO problem in showing a picture.
hoyt28
|
September 07, 2010
What is wrong with having to have a picture ID to vote? If you want to vote you should be proud to show proof of who you are, over the years there has been so much fraud in voting and this is a way to make sure that you are entitled to vote and cast you ballot without doubt. Only someone who wants voter fraud would object to showing a picture ID.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.