ACC recommends pouring suspension at Peach Palace
by Jeff Gable
21 months ago | 3151 views | 7 7 comments | 15 15 recommendations | email to a friend | print
An a wine package license was approved for Riverside Gourmet for select wine-tasting events.
An a wine package license was approved for Riverside Gourmet for select wine-tasting events.
slideshow
The Rome Alcohol Control Commission on Monday night recommended a two-day suspension of alcohol pouring privileges at the Peach Palace after a report of a service permit violation earlier this month.

The ACC examined a report by the Rome Police Department stemming from an incident on April 1 at the 425 Broad St. restaurant, in which law enforcement saw an unidentified employee serving alcohol without a permit.

Since this was the second alcohol service permit violation by the business, the ACC recommended a two-day suspension for the Peach Palace’s pouring license.

That request will go before the full City Commission at its May 3 meeting. The suspension days suggested by the ACC would be Friday, May 7 and Saturday, May 8, but the decision will be made by the City Commission.

The ACC also approved the request for several new pouring licenses, and it also approved a request for some special events that would serve alcohol.

The commission examined four requests for alcohol licenses at several businesses, and all four were approved after some discussion by the commission.

The requests were from Vipul Patel of The Market on 2nd, a beer and wine package license; Kevin Dillmon of Riverside Gourmet, a wine package license for select wine-tasting events; Jennifer Hoff of DJ’s Tavern, a beer and wine pouring license; and Donald Canada III of Broad Street Station, a beer, wine and liquor pouring license.

The Market is a convenience store on Second Avenue, while Dillmon is moving his business to 248 Broad St. Hoff is opening the new tavern at 17 John Davenport Drive, while Canada is planning to open Broad Street Station at 325 Broad, the former location of McCrobie’s.

In other business, the ACC approved a request by the Rome Symphony Orchestra to serve alcohol in the City Auditorium lobby during select concert events. The ACC also agreed to let Las Palmas on Riverside Parkway have a Cinco de Mayo party in the River Crossing parking lot on May 5.

The approval was done with the stipulation that surrounding businesses did not object, and that entry and consumption in the tent next to the restaurant would be strictly regulated.

The commission also examined the results of a recent survey about the food and drink ratio compared to other cities. The survey by the City Clerk’s office found that Dalton, Columbus, Valdosta, Smyrna, Gainesville and Statesboro all share the same 50-50 ratio as Rome. Some metro Atlanta communities, such as Marietta and Kennesaw, do not have a food-to-drink ratio.

The ACC said that the issue is one that is revisited on various occasions to see if the city’s policy needs any changes.
Comments
(7)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
RealEstateMystic
|
April 28, 2010
RomeWrecker: I agree. ohreally should have crammed all of this into a letter to the editor, where it might get more exposure.
MIKYGA
|
April 28, 2010
Ha ha!

Agreed.
RomeWrecker
|
April 28, 2010
Geez, ohreally, that was a well thought out opinion, complete with researched information and logical points.

What are you doing commenting on this site like that?
ohreally
|
April 27, 2010
The 50/50 food-drink ratio that the ACC is referring to is very misleading. While these other counties have these ratios in place, the ACC fails to mention how expensive it is to acquire a Liquor, Beer, and Wine pouring license in Floyd County. Remember, Floyd County is relatively small compared to the Metro counties that I am comparing prices so Rome inheritably has a smaller group of patrons to recoup their licensing monies. I don’t have the exact numbers for a pouring license in Floyd County but I believe it is in excess of $15,000 per year.

Let us now look at some of the larger metro areas and what they are charged for licensing fees. Dekalb County’s fees for pouring Liquor, Beer, and Wine are $3900. Forsyth County charges $4000 for their pouring license. Gwinnett County charges $4500. Paulding County charges $8000.

With the numbers listed above, you can see why it is so hard for bars to stay open in Rome. They not only have the burden of these overpriced licensing fees, they must also put up with the strict regulations put on them by the ACC and the City Commissioners. Did I mention that you have to have a Entertainment License to have bands play? And if you do have the Entertainment License in place and you want to do anything outside of your normal business operations - you must apply for another permit? No chance to have a Cinco de Mayo party without the correct paperwork in place (yeah, a special events application and fee is required). Forget about having a promotion with the Wait Staff in bathing suits (adult ordinance violation). When anything out of the norm is to take place, the City of Rome has to have it's hand out wanting their portion. You would think "their portion" would have been covered by the $15,000 License Fee.

The City of Rome are setting up these businesses to fail from the start. I don’t see an entertainment venue in Rome ever succeeding unless some rules are changed. We’ll always have bars around because the mega chains (Applebee’s, Chili’s, Longhorn’s, etc) can always makes money because of their name and their food sales. They never worry about hitting the 50/50 food-drink ratio. But you will never be able to hear the local and talented bands play in these establishments either.

RealEstateMystic
|
April 27, 2010
This whole sell-a-license/suspend-a-license farce has gone on long enough.

I think that if the city is set on tightly policing drinking establishments on Broad Street, they should just go ahead and prohibit drinking establishments on Broad St. I won't miss them, most patorns won't miss them, and the investors who start these businesses will be free to relocate to friendlier districts.
joesgrljeni
|
April 27, 2010
I can't speak to why the officer was there, but I do know, having worked in several places that serve alcohol, that you must have your serving permit on you and visible at all times. It is a law that has been in effect for many years and all places that serve know this. It is the business owner/manager's responsibility to make sure that they train their servers to wear there permits in a visible manner at all times that they are on the clock. As we all know, in a town like Rome, you better make sure that you cross all the t's and dot all the i's. Especially if you serve alcohol in your business!
RealEstateMystic
|
April 27, 2010
Local pouring policy: "Restaurant owners, we're watching you."

The anti-alcohol climate that prevails in this city is one reason I seldom if ever eat out in Rome. At my age, the only time I expect to be carded is at a traffic stop or if I'm stepping on an airplane. Any other context classifies as intrusive, and unfortunately, our restaurants are forced to participate in the hospitality industry in a less than hospitable manner, i.e., as cocktail cops. It's all part of an ongoing effort at social engineering on the part of your friendly local Baptists.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.